OR: ENG
TRIAL CHAMBER II
Before:
Judge Asoka de Silva,
Presiding
Judge Flavia Lattanzi
Judge Florence Rita Arrey
Registrar: Mr Adama Dieng
Date: 14 November 2005
THE PROSECUTOR
vs.
THARCISSE MUVUNYI
Case No. ICTR-2000-55A-T
ORAL DECISION ON THE “ACCUSED’S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE” AND « REQUETE EN EXTREME URGENCE DE THARCISSE MUVUNYI POUR LE REPORT DU PROCES »
Prosecution Counsel |
Defence Counsel |
Mr
Charles Adeogun-Phillips, Senior Trial Attorney |
Mr
William E. Taylor, III, Lead Counsel |
MR. PRESIDENT:
[…]
Yes, the Chamber has considered the Accused's emergency motion for continuance, the motion filed by the accused person on his own behalf, as well as the oral submissions of the parties, and rules as follows:
Firstly, every Chamber has the right to review its decisions in the interest of justice and in the light of prevailing circumstances. Even though the Chamber previously ordered that witness statements should be disclosed to the opposing party at least 21 days before the witness testifies, the Chamber believes that in the light of the current circumstances it would be in the interests of justice to review that order.
The Chamber orders the Defence disclose the statements of
its three designated witnesses, namely MO60, MO70 and MO38, to the Prosecution
not later than
The Defence case shall commence on
The statement of the remaining witnesses ‑‑ Defence witnesses shall be disclosed to the Prosecution at least 21 days before the respective testimonies of those witnesses.
The Defence is hereby ordered to provide to the WVSS, not
later than
The Chamber urges all the members of the Defence team to cooperate fully in the defence of the accused person until a decision is rendered by the registrar in regard to the pending application.
The Chamber reiterates its disapproval of the conduct of
Defence counsel and its warning rendered on
Having given this order I think the proceedings should come
to an end today, and the court is adjourned until